4.7 Article

Evolution of the dynamic susceptibility in molecular glass formers: Results from light scattering, dielectric spectroscopy, and NMR

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 138, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4770055

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [RO 907/10, RO 907/11, RO 907/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although broadly studied, molecular glass formers are not well investigated above their melting point. Correlation times down to 10(-12) s are easily accessible when studying low-T-g systems by depolarized light scattering, employing a tandem-Fabry-Perot interferometer and a double monochromator. When combining these techniques with state-of-the-art photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS), broad band susceptibility spectra become accessible which can compete with those of dielectric spectroscopy (DS). Comparing the results with those from DS, optical Kerr effect, and NMR, we describe the evolution of the susceptibilities starting from the boiling point T-b down to T-g, i.e., from simple liquid to glassy dynamics. Special attention is given to the emergence of the excess wing contribution which is also probed by PCS and which signals a crossover of the spectral evolution. The process is attributed to a small-angle precursor process of the alpha-relaxation, and the apparent probe dependent stretching of the a-process is explained by a probe dependent contribution of the excess wing. Upon cooling, its emergence is linked to a strong decrease of the strength of the fast dynamics which is taken as reorientational analog of the anomaly of the Debye-Waller factor. Many glass formers show in addition a slow beta-process which manifests itself rather universally in NMR, in DS, however, with different amplitudes, but not at all in PCS experiments. Finally, a three-parameter function is discussed interpolating t(alpha)(T) from T-b to T-g by connecting high-and low-temperature dynamics. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4770055]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据