4.8 Article

Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain

期刊

NEURON
卷 87, 期 3, 页码 657-670

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.037

关键词

-

资金

  1. McDonnell Foundation Collaborative Activity award
  2. Hope Center for Neurological Disorders Pilot Award
  3. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at Washington University [NIH/NICHDP30 HD062171]
  4. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Pilot Grant
  5. Child Neurology Foundation Scientific Research Award
  6. WU Child Health Research Center [K12-HD076224]
  7. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience New Resource Proposal
  8. Dart NeuroScience LLC
  9. Texas Emerging Technology Fund
  10. [MH100872]
  11. [NS61144]
  12. [NS46424]
  13. [P30NS048056]
  14. [NS088590]
  15. [DGE-1143954]
  16. [MH091657]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resting state functional MRI (fMRI) has enabled description of group-level functional brain organization at multiple spatial scales. However, cross-subject averaging may obscure patterns of brain organization specific to each individual. Here, we characterized the brain organization of a single individual repeatedly measured over more than a year. We report a reproducible and internally valid subject-specific areal-level parcellation that corresponds with subject-specific task activations. Highly convergent correlation network estimates can be derived from this parcellation if sufficient data are collected-considerably more than typically acquired. Notably, within-subject correlation variability across sessions exhibited a heterogeneous distribution across the cortex concentrated in visual and somato-motor regions, distinct from the pattern of intersubject variability. Further, although the individual's systems-level organization is broadly similar to the group, it demonstrates distinct topological features. These results provide a foundation for studies of individual differences in cortical organization and function, especially for special or rare individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据