4.7 Article

Determining the appropriate exchange-correlation functional for time-dependent density functional theory studies of charge-transfer excitations in organic dyes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 136, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4725540

关键词

approximation theory; charge exchange; density functional theory; dyes; electron correlations; exchange interactions (electron); excited states; ultraviolet spectra; visible spectra

资金

  1. EMPOWER
  2. Irish Research Council for Science and Engineering (IRCSET)
  3. Science Foundation Ireland [07/SRC/B1160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UV-Vis spectra are calculated using time-dependent density functional theory for several organic dyes - 4-(N, N-dimethylamino) benzonitrile, alizarin, squaraine, polyene-linker dyes, oligothiophene-containing coumarin dyes (NKX series) and triphenylamine-donor dyes. Most of these dyes (except, for the first two) or their derivatives are considered to be promising organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. An accurate description of the photophysics of such dyes is imperative for understanding and creating better dyes. To this end, we studied the dyes within several approximations to the exchange-correlation functional. The chosen functionals - PBE, M06L, B3LYP, M06, CAM-B3LYP, and wB97 - represent the various classes of approximations that are currently being used to study material properties. From amongst the six approximations studied here, CAM-B3LYP outperformed the others in its description of charge-transfer excitations in most (though, not all) of the dyes. This study shows why it is difficult to choose a particular functional a priori, especially when starting out with a new dye for solar cell application. A possible way to judge the fitness of an approximation is used in this work and it is shown to provide a good quantitative guideline for subsequent research in this field. (C) 2012 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4725540]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据