4.2 Article

A novel m.7539C > T point mutation in the mt-tRNA(Asp) gene associated with multisystemic mitochondrial disease

期刊

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 81-84

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.09.008

关键词

Mitochondria; Multisystemic disease; tRNA(Asp)

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research
  2. Wellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research [096919Z/11/Z]
  3. Medical Research Council (UK) Centre for Translational Muscle Disease research [G0601943]
  4. Lily Foundation
  5. UK NHS Highly Specialised Rare Mitochondrial Disorders of Adults and Children Service
  6. Medical Research Council [G0601943] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [G0601943] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial transfer RNA (mt-tRNA) mutations are the commonest sub-type of mitochondrial (mtDNA) mutations associated with human disease. We report a patient with multisytemic disease characterised by myopathy, spinal ataxia, sensorineural hearing loss, cataract and cognitive impairment in whom a novel m.7539C>T mt-tRNA(Asp) transition was identified. Muscle biopsy revealed extensive histopathological findings including cytochrome c oxidase (COX)-deficient fibres. Pyrosequencing confirmed mtDNA heteroplasmy for the mutation whilst single muscle fibre segregation studies revealed statistically significant higher mutation loads in COX-deficient fibres than in COX-positive fibres. Absence from control databases, hierarchical mt-tRNA mutation segregation within tissues, and occurrence at conserved sequence positions, further confirm this novel mt-tRNA mutation to be pathogenic. To date only three mt-tRNA(Asp) gene mutations have been described with clear evidence of pathogenicity. The novel m.7539C>T mt-tRNA(Asp) gene mutation extends the spectrum of pathogenic mutations in this gene, further supporting the notion that mt-tRNA(Asp) gene mutations are associated with multisystemic disease presentations. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据