4.7 Article

Quantum dynamics of rovibrational transitions in H2-H2 collisions: Internal energy and rotational angular momentum conservation effects

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 134, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3595134

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-0855470, ATM-0635715, PHY-0854838, AST-0607733]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Physics [0855470] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0635715] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a full dimensional quantum mechanical treatment of collisions between two H-2 molecules over a wide range of energies. Elastic and state-to-state inelastic cross sections for ortho-H-2 + para-H-2 and ortho-H-2 + ortho-H-2 collisions have been computed for different initial rovibrational levels of the molecules. For rovibrationally excited molecules, it has been found that state-to-state transitions are highly specific. Inelastic collisions that conserve the total rotational angular momentum of the diatoms and that involve small changes in the internal energy are found to be highly efficient. The effectiveness of these quasiresonant processes increases with decreasing collision energy and they become highly state-selective at ultracold temperatures. They are found to be more dominant for rotational energy exchange than for vibrational transitions. For non-reactive collisions between ortho- and para-H-2 molecules for which rotational energy exchange is forbidden, the quasiresonant mechanism involves a purely vibrational energy transfer albeit with less efficiency. When inelastic collisions are dominated by a quasiresonant transition calculations using a reduced basis set involving only the quasiresonant channels yield nearly identical results as the full basis set calculation leading to dramatic savings in computational cost. (c) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3595134]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据