4.7 Article

Breaking the carbon dimer: The challenges of multiple bond dissociation with full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 135, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3624383

关键词

-

资金

  1. Trinity College, Cambridge
  2. Woolf Fisher Trust
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J003867/1, EP/I014624/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/I014624/1, EP/J003867/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo (FCIQMC) method, as well as its initiator extension (i-FCIQMC), is used to tackle the complex electronic structure of the carbon dimer across the entire dissociation reaction coordinate, as a prototypical example of a strongly correlated molecular system. Various basis sets of increasing size up to the large cc-pVQZ are used, spanning a fully accessible N-electron basis of over 10(12) Slater determinants, and the accuracy of the method is demonstrated in each basis set. Convergence to the FCI limit is achieved in the largest basis with only O[10(7)] walkers within random errorbars of a few tenths of a millihartree across the binding curve, and extensive comparisons to FCI, CCSD(T), MRCI, and CEEIS results are made where possible. A detailed exposition of the convergence properties of the FCIQMC methods is provided, considering convergence with elapsed imaginary time, number of walkers and size of the basis. Various symmetries which can be incorporated into the stochastic dynamic, beyond the standard abelian point group symmetry and spin polarisation are also described. These can have significant benefit to the computational effort of the calculations, as well as the ability to converge to various excited states. The results presented demonstrate a new benchmark accuracy in basis-set energies for systems of this size, significantly improving on previous state of the art estimates. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3624383]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据