4.7 Article

Short-time rheology and diffusion in suspensions of Yukawa-type colloidal particles

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 135, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3646962

关键词

colloids; diffusion; electric potential; fluids; freezing; hydrodynamics; rheology; suspensions; viscosity

资金

  1. International Helmholtz Research School of Biophysics and Soft Matter (IHRS BioSoft)
  2. SeCyT-UNC
  3. CONICET
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB-TR6, B2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comprehensive study is presented on the short-time dynamics in suspensions of charged colloidal spheres. The explored parameter space covers the major part of the fluid-state regime, with colloid concentrations extending up to the freezing transition. The particles are assumed to interact directly by a hard-core plus screened Coulomb potential, and indirectly by solvent-mediated hydrodynamic interactions. By comparison with accurate accelerated Stokesian Dynamics (ASD) simulations of the hydrodynamic function H(q), and the high-frequency viscosity eta(infinity), we investigate the accuracy of two fast and easy-to-implement analytical schemes. The first scheme, referred to as the pairwise additive (PA) scheme, uses exact two-body hydrodynamic mobility tensors. It is in good agreement with the ASD simulations of H(q) and eta(infinity), for smaller volume fractions up to about 10% and 20%, respectively. The second scheme is a hybrid method combining the virtues of the delta gamma scheme by Beenakker and Mazur with those of the PA scheme. It leads to predictions in good agreement with the simulation data, for all considered concentrations, combining thus precision with computational efficiency. The hybrid method is used to test the accuracy of a generalized Stokes-Einstein (GSE) relation proposed by Kholodenko and Douglas, showing its severe violation in low salinity systems. For hard spheres, however, this GSE relation applies decently well. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3646962]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据