4.7 Article

A transition state view on reactive scattering: Initial state-selected reaction probabilities for the H+CH4→H2+CH3 reaction studied in full dimensionality

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 133, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3489409

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Initial state-selected reaction probabilities for the H+CH4 -> H-2+CH3 reaction are computed for vanishing total angular momentum by full-dimensional calculations employing the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree approach. An ensemble of wave packets completely describing reactivity for total energies up to 0.58 eV is constructed in the transition state region by diagonalization of the thermal flux operator. These wave packets are then propagated into the reactant asymptotic region to obtain the initial state-selected reaction probabilities. Reaction probabilities for reactants in all rotational states of the vibrational 1A(1), 1F(2), and 1E levels of methane are presented. Vibrational excitation is found to decrease reactivity when reaction probabilities at equivalent total energies are compared but to increase reaction probabilities when the comparison is done at the basis of equivalent collision energies. Only a fraction of the initial vibrational energy can be utilized to promote the reaction. The effect of rotational excitation on the reactivity differs depending on the initial vibrational state of methane. For the 1A(1) and 1F(2) vibrational states of methane, rotational excitation decreases the reaction probability even when comparing reaction probabilities at equivalent collision energies. In contrast, rotational energy is even more efficient than translational energy in increasing the reaction probability when the reaction starts from the 1E vibrational state of methane. All findings can be explained employing a transition state based interpretation of the reaction process. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3489409]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据