4.7 Article

Microscopic origins of the ferromagnetic exchange coupling in oxoverdazyl-based Cu(II) complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 132, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3378023

关键词

antiferromagnetism; copper; exchange interactions (electron); ferromagnetism; free radicals

资金

  1. ANR fdp magnets Project
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Inovacion of Spain [CTQ 2008-06644-C02-02, CTQ 2009-07767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exchange channels governing the experimentally reported coupling constant (J(expt)=6 cm(-1)) value in the verdazyl-ligand based Cu(II) complex [Cu(hfac)(2)(imvdz)] are inspected using wave function-based difference dedicated configuration interaction calculations. The interaction between the two spin 1/2 holders is summed up in a unique coupling constant J. Nevertheless, by gradually increasing the level of calculation, different mechanisms of interaction are turned on step by step. In the present system, the calculated exchange interaction then appears alternatively ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic/ferromagnetic. Our analysis demonstrates the tremendously importance of some specific exchange mechanisms. It is actually shown that both parts of the imvdz ligand simultaneously influence the ferromagnetic behavior which ultimately reaches J(calc)=6.3 cm(-1), in very good agreement with the experimental value. In accordance with the alternation of J, it is shown that the nature of the magnetic behavior results from competing channels. First, an antiferromagnetic contribution can be essentially attributed to single excitations involving the pi network localized on the verdazyl part. In contrast, the sigma ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) involving the imidazole moiety affords a ferromagnetic contribution. The distinct nature sigma/pi of the mechanisms is responsible for the net ferromagnetic behavior. The intuitively innocent part of the verdazyl-based ligands is deeply reconsidered and opens new routes into the rational design of magnetic objects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据