4.7 Article

The dependence of the ultrafast relaxation kinetics of the S2 and S1 states in β-carotene homologs and lycopene on conjugation length studied by femtosecond time-resolved absorption and Kerr-gate fluorescence spectroscopies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 130, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3147008

关键词

bonds (chemical); excited states; fluorescence; high-speed optical techniques; macromolecules; organic compounds; potential energy surfaces; time resolved spectra

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ultrafast relaxation kinetics of all-trans-beta-carotene homologs with varying numbers of conjugated double bonds n(n=7-15) and lycopene (n=11) has been investigated using femtosecond time-resolved absorption and Kerr-gate fluorescence spectroscopies, both carried out under identical excitation conditions. The nonradiative relaxation rates of the optically allowed S-2(1(1)B(u)(+)) state were precisely determined by the time-resolved fluorescence. The kinetics of the optically forbidden S-1(2(1)A(g)(-)) state were observed by the time-resolved absorption measurements. The dependence of the S-1 relaxation rates upon the conjugation length is adequately described by application of the energy gap law. In contrast to this, the nonradiative relaxation rates of S-2 have a minimum at n=9 and show a reverse energy gap law dependence for values of n above 11. This anomalous behavior of the S-2 relaxation rates can be explained by the presence of an intermediate state (here called the S-x state) located between the S-2 and S-1 states at large values of n (such as n=11). The presence of such an intermediate state would then result in the following sequential relaxation pathway S-2 -> S-x -> S-1 -> S-0. A model based on conical intersections between the potential energy curves of these excited singlet states can readily explain the measured relationships between the decay rates and the energy gaps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据