4.7 Article

Kinetic nucleation model for free expanding water condensation plume simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 130, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3129804

关键词

aerodynamics; condensation; flow simulation; molecular clusters; molecular dynamics method; nucleation; potential energy functions; stagnation flow; water

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [F49620-02-1-0104]
  2. Chemistry Division of the National Science Foundation [CHE-0456514]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) simulations of homogeneous condensation in free expansion water plumes [Z. Li, J. Zhong, D. A. Levin, and B. Garrison, AIAA J. 47, 1241 (2009)] show that the nucleation rate is a key factor for accurately modeling condensation phenomenon. In this work, we use molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a free expansion to explore the microscopic mechanisms of water dimer formation and develop collision models required by DSMC. Bimolecular and termolecular dimer cluster formation mechanisms are considered and the former is found to be the main mechanism in expanding flows to vacuum. MD simulations between two water molecules using the simple point charge intermolecular potential were performed to predict the bimolecular dimer formation probability and the probability was found to decrease with collision energy. The formation probabilities and postcollisional velocity and energy distributions were then integrated into DSMC simulations of a free expansion of an orifice condensation plume with different chamber stagnation temperatures and pressures. The dimer mole fraction was found to increase with distance from the orifice and become constant after a distance of about two orifice diameters. Similar to experiment, the terminal dimer mole fraction was found to decrease with chamber stagnation temperatures and increase linearly with chamber stagnation pressures which is consistent with a bimolecular nucleation mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据