4.7 Article

Born-Oppenheimer and Renner-Teller coupled-channel quantum dynamics of the N(2D)+HD reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 131, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3190329

关键词

atom-molecule reactions; Coriolis force; excited states; ground states; hydrogen compounds; nitrogen; potential energy surfaces; reaction rate constants; vibronic states

资金

  1. European Community [228398]
  2. Ministero per l'Istruzione, l'Universita, e la Ricerca
  3. Universita di Siena
  4. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science and Science and Innovation [CTQ2005-09334-C02-01, CTQ2008-06805-C02-01]
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya (Autonomous Government of Catalonia) [2009SGR17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) and Renner-Teller (RT) coupled-channel dynamics of the N(D-2)+HD -> NH+D and N(D-2)+HD -> ND+H reactions, considering the X approximate to (2)A(') and A approximate to (2)A(') states and RT and Coriolis couplings. We use the best available potential energy surfaces and obtain initial-state-resolved probabilities, cross sections, and rate constants via the real wave packet and flux methods for both electronic states. In contrast with the RT results of BO-X approximate to (2)A(') ones, we point out the role of RT and Coriolis interactions for both reactions and discuss the importance of the excited state on the initial-state-resolved dynamics and on the thermal kinetic rate. Moreover the competition for the formation of two products is discussed, showing some snapshots of the RT wave-packet density on the ground state. However, the BO approximation gives thermal rates that are smaller than those obtained via full RT calculation, especially at 300 K. Our calculated RT rate constants at room temperature are in good agreement with the experimental ones. The branching ratio is also calculated at T=150-300 K at BO and RT levels. At 300 K the calculated value overestimates slightly the experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据