4.7 Article

Vibrational branching ratios in the (b2u)-1 photoionization of C6F6

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 131, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3180817

关键词

bond lengths; molecule-photon collisions; organic compounds; oscillator strengths; photoionisation; positive ions; resonant states; vibrational states

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-01ER15178]
  2. Texas A&M University Supercomputing Facility
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-01ER15178] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vibrational branching ratios in the photoionization of C6F6 leading to the C B-2(2u) state of C6F6+ are considered. Computational and experimental data are compared for the excitation of two totally symmetric modes. Resonant features at photon energies near 19 and 21 eV are found. A detailed analysis of the computed results shows that the two resonance states have different responses to changes in the C-C and C-F bond lengths. We find that the energies of both of the resonant states decrease with increasing bond lengths. In contrast to the energy positions, however, the resonant widths and the integrated oscillator strength of the resonances can either increase or decrease with increasing bond length depending on the nature and location of the resonant state and the location of the bond under consideration. With increasing C-F bond length, we find that the energy of the antibonding sigma resonance localized on the ring has a decreasing resonance energy and also a decreasing lifetime. This behavior is in contrast to the usual behavior of shape resonance energies where increasing a bond length leads to decreasing resonance energies and increasing resonance lifetimes. Finally, for the first time, we examine the effect of simultaneously occurring multiple vibrations on the resonance profile for valence photoionization, and we find that the inclusion of more than a single vibrational mode substantially attenuates the strength of resonance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据