4.7 Review

Mixed time-dependent density-functional theory/classical trajectory surface hopping study of oxirane photochemistry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 129, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2978380

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a mixed time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT)/classical trajectory surface hopping (SH) study of the photochemical ring opening in oxirane. Previous preparatory work limited to the symmetric CC ring-opening pathways of oxirane concluded that the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA) is important for improving the performance of TDDFT away from the equilibrium geometry. This observation is supported by the present TDDFT TDA/SH calculations which successfully confirm the main experimentally derived Gomer-Noyes mechanism for the photochemical CO ring opening of oxirane and, in addition, provide important state-specific information not easily accessible from experiments. In particular, we find that, while one of the lowest two excited states is photochemically relatively inert, excitation into the other excited state leads predominantly to rapid ring opening, cyclic-C2H4O ->(CH2CH2O center dot)-C-center dot. This is followed by hopping to the electronic ground state where hot (4000 K) dynamics leads to further reactions, namely, (CH2CH2O center dot)-C-center dot -> CH3CHO ->(CH3)-C-center dot+(CHO)-C-center dot and CH4+CO. We note that, in the dynamics, we are not limited to following minimum energy pathways and several surface hops may actually be needed before products are finally reached. The performance of different functionals is then assessed by comparison of TDDFT and diffusion Monte Carlo potential energy curves along a typical TDDFT TDA/SH reaction path. Finally, although true (S-0, S-1) conical intersections are expected to be absent in adiabatic TDDFT, we show that the TDDFT TDA is able to approximate a conical intersection in this system. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据