4.7 Article

Construction of a generalized gradient approximation by restoring the density-gradient expansion and enforcing a tight Lieb-Oxford bound

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 128, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2912068

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, a generalized gradient approximation (GGA) to the density functional, called PBEsol, was optimized (one parameter) against the jellium-surface exchange-correlation energies, and this, in conjunction with changing another parameter to restore the first-principles gradient expansion for exchange, was sufficient to yield accurate lattice constants of solids. Here, we construct a new GGA that has no empirical parameters, that satisfies one more exact constraint than PBEsol, and that performs 20% better for the lattice constants of 18 previously studied solids, although it does not improve on PBEsol for molecular atomization energies (a property that neither functional was designed for). The new GGA is exact through second order, and it is called the second-order generalized gradient approximation (SOGGA). The SOGGA functional also differs from other GGAs in that it enforces a tighter Lieb-Oxford bound. SOGGA and other functionals are compared to a diverse set of lattice constants, bond distances, and energetic quantities for solids and molecules (this includes the first test of the M06-L meta-GGA for solid-state properties). We find that classifying density functionals in terms of the magnitude mu of the second-order coefficient of the density gradient expansion of the exchange functional not only correlates their behavior for predicting lattice constants of solids versus their behavior for predicting small-molecule atomization energies, as pointed out by Perdew and co-workers [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 134606 (2008); Perdewibid. 80, 891 (1998)], but also correlates their behavior for cohesive energies of solids, reaction barriers heights, and nonhydrogenic bond distances in small molecules. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据