4.7 Article

Molecular Dynamics Investigation on a Series of HIV Protease Inhibitors: Assessing the Performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA Approaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
卷 52, 期 11, 页码 3088-3098

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ci300385h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi [SR/FT/CS-031/2009]
  2. DBT
  3. CSIR, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binding free energies (Delta G(Bind)) obtained from molecular mechanics with Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) or molecular mechanics with Generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) calculations using molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories are the most popular procedures to measure the strength of interactions between a ligand and its receptor. Several attempts have been made to correlate the Delta G(Bind) and experimental IC50 values in order to observe the relationship between binding strength of a ligand (with its receptor) and its inhibitory activity. The duration of MD simulations seems very important for getting acceptable correlation. Here, we are presenting a systematic study to estimate the reasonable MD simulation time for acceptable correlation between Delta G(Bind) and experimental IC50 values. A comparison between MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches is also presented at various time scales. MD simulations (10 ns) for 14 HIV protease inhibitors have been carried out by using the Amber program. MM-PBSA/GBSA based Delta G(Bind) have been calculated and correlated with experimental IC(50)values at different time scales (0-1 to 0-10 ns). This study clearly demonstrates that the MM-PBSA based Delta G(Bind) (Delta G(Bind)-PB) values provide very good correlation with experimental IC50 values (quantitative and qualitative) when MD simulation is carried out for a longer time; however, MM-GBSA based Delta G(Bind) (Delta G(Bind)-GB) values show acceptable correlation for shorter time of simulation also. The accuracy of Delta G(Bind)-PB increases and Delta G(Bind)-GB remains almost constant with the increasing time of simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据