4.7 Article

Assessing Synthetic Accessibility of Chemical Compounds Using Machine Learning Methods

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ci900301v

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [ACI-0133464, IIS-0431135]
  2. NIH [R01 LM008713A]
  3. Digital Technology Center at the University of Minnesota
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [905220] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With de novo rational drug design, scientists can rapidly generate a very large number of potentially biologically active probes. However, many of them may be synthetically infeasible and, therefore, of limited value to drug developers. On the other hand, most of the tools for synthetic accessibility evaluation are very slow and can process only a few molecules per minute. In this study, we present two approaches to quickly predict the synthetic accessibility of chemical compounds by utilizing support vector machines operating on molecular descriptors. The first approach, RSSVM, is designed to identify the compounds that can be synthesized using a specific set of reactions and starting materials and builds its model by training on the compounds identified as synthetically accessible or not by retrosynthetic analysis. The second approach, DRSVM, is designed to provide a more general assessment of synthetic accessibility that is not tied to any set of reactions or starting materials. The training set compounds for this approach are selected from a diverse library based on the number of other similar compounds within the same library. Both approaches have been shown to perform very well in their corresponding areas of applicability with the RSSVM achieving a receiver operator characteristic score of 0.952 in cross-validation experiments and the DRSVM achieving a score of 0.888 on an independent set of compounds. Our implementations can successfully process thousands of compounds per minute.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据