4.7 Article

Investigations of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions Based on Physicochemical Descriptors Applied to Hydrolases

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 1525-1534

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ci800277f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fuer Bildung and Forschung (BMBF)
  2. Nationales Genomforqchungsnetz Deutschland (NGFN) [031U112D, 031U212D, 031U112A, 031U212A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EC number system for the classification of enzymes uses different criteria such as reaction pattern, the nature of the substrate, the type of transferred groups or the type of acceptor group. These criteria are used with different emphasis for the various enzyme classes and thus do not contribute much to an understanding of the mechanisms of enzyme catalyzed reactions. To explore the reasons for bonds being broken in enzyme catalyzed metabolic reactions, we calculated physicochemical effects for the bonds reacting in the substrate of these enzymatic reactions. These descriptors allow the definition of similarities within these reactions and thus can serve as a method for the classification of enzyme reactions. To foster an understanding of the investigations per-formed here, we compare the similarities found on the basis of the physicochemical effects with the EC number classification. To allow a reasonable comparison we selected enzymatic reactions where the EC number system is largely built on criteria based on the reaction mechanism. This is true for hydrolysis reactions, falling into the domain of the EC class 3 (EC 3.b.c.d). The comparison is made by a Kohonen neural network based on an unsupervised learning algorithm. For these hydrolysis reactions, the similarity analysis on physicochemical effects produces results that are, by and large, similar to the EC number. However, this similarity analysis reveals finer details of the enzymatic reactions and thus can provide a better basis for the mechanistic comparison of enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据