4.2 Article

Experimental Characterizations and Swelling Studies of Natural and Activated Bentonites with Their Commercial Applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 67-77

出版社

SOC CHEMICAL ENG JAPAN
DOI: 10.1252/jcej.10we187

关键词

Bentonite; Nano-porous and Nano-structured Montmorillonite; Swelling; Applications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bentonites contain a large amount of nano-porous and nano-structured montmorillonite, which is the dominant clay mineral determining the swelling properties of bentonites. In this study, bentonites are categorized into three types, namely swelling (Na-montmorillonite), nonswelling-swelling (Ca, Na-montmorillonite), and non-swelling (Ca-montmorillonite). Soda activation with the optimum parameters also increases the swelling properties of bentonites. The instrumental and experimental analyses for specifying bentonite for each application include pH, Methylene Blue (M. B.) test, Cation Exchange Capacity (C. E. C.) measurements; Swell, M. B., sediment, and colloid indices, dry screen analysis (granulometric analysis), XRD (X-ray diffraction), XRF (X-ray fluorescence). pH results showed higher values for swelling bentonites (group 3) and these values increased after soda activation. The values of C. E. C., M. B. test, and indices are normally higher for group 3 than for group 2 (non-swelling-swelling type). These values were directly related with the amount of clay minerals (montmorillonites) in dry screen analysis. Finally, swelling and non-swelling effects on bentonite particles play an important role in their applications. Swelling bentonites like ES3 are good for applications such as barriers, drilling mud, and plethorapy. Group 2 (nonswelling-swelling) such as S2, G1, and GH1 are good bentonites for use as a filtering agent in juice industries due to being lower voluminous material than that of production with group 3. For pharmaceutical applications, in addition to the swelling index, sediment and colloid indices must be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据