4.7 Article

Seizure localization using ictal phase-locked high gamma A retrospective surgical outcome study

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 84, 期 23, 页码 2320-2328

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001656

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01-NS084142, R25-10416928]
  2. Epilepsy Foundation
  3. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme
  4. Epilepsy Research UK
  5. MRC [MR/J013250/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Epilepsy Research UK [P1004] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/J013250/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether resection of areas with evidence of intense, synchronized neural firing during seizures is an accurate indicator of postoperative outcome. Methods: Channels meeting phase-locked high gamma (PLHG) criteria were identified retrospectively from intracranial EEG recordings (102 seizures, 46 implantations, 45 patients). Extent of removal of both the seizure onset zone (SOZ) and PLHG was correlated with seizure outcome, classified as good (Engel class I or II, n = 32) or poor (Engel class III or IV, n = 13). Results: Patients with good outcomes had significantly greater proportions of both SOZ and the first 4 (early) PLHG sites resected. Improved outcome classification was noted with early PLHG, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (PLHG 0.79, SOZ 0.68) and by odds ratios for resections including at least 75% of sites identified by each measure (PLHG 9.7 [95% CI: 2.3-41.5], SOZ 5.3 [95% CI: 1.2-23.3]). Among patients with resection of at least 75% of the SOZ, 78% (n = 30) had good outcomes, increasing to 91% when the resection also included at least 75% of early PLHG sites (n = 22). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the localizing value of early PLHG, which is comparable to that provided by the SOZ. Incorporation of PLHG into the clinical evaluation may improve surgical efficacy and help to focus resections on the most critical areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据