4.7 Article

Stroke subtype and motor impairment influence contralesional excitability

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 85, 期 6, 页码 517-520

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001828

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD of the NIH [R01HD069776]
  2. Sidney R. Baer Jr. Foundation
  3. NIH [R01HD069776, R01NS073601, R21 MH099196, R21 NS082870, R21 NS085491, R21 HD07616]
  4. Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NCRR)
  5. Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NCATS NIH) [UL1 RR025758]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:The nonlesioned motor cortex (M1(NL)) is thought to be hyperexcitable in patients with subacute or chronic stroke and offers a promising therapeutic target. However, whether M1(NL) excitability behaves the same for subcortical and cortical strokes is unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cortical, or purely subcortical, strokes have a different effect on M1(NL) excitability.Methods:We looked for correlations between the Fugl-Meyer (FM) score and M1(NL) resting motor threshold (RMTNL) in 34 stroke survivors classified according to lesion location (cortico-subcortical or purely subcortical). In addition to the FM, the Wolf Motor Score and motor power were measured.Results:FM correlated with RMTNL for subcortical (r = 0.82; p = 0.001) but not for cortical strokes (r = 0.11; p = 0.62). Likewise, Wolf Motor Score (r = -0.62; p = 0.03) and motor power (r = 0.64; p = 0.023) were correlated with RMTNL for the subcortical group, but not for the cortical group.Conclusion:We show that the impact on M1(NL) depends on lesion location and conclude that protocols aimed at reducing M1(NL) cortical excitability may be worth exploring for subcortical but not for cortical stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据