4.3 Article

Identification and Binding Characterization of Three Odorant Binding Proteins and One Chemosensory Protein from Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dur)

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY
卷 38, 期 9, 页码 1163-1170

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-012-0178-7

关键词

Apolygus lucorum; Odorant binding protein (OBP); Chemosensory protein (CSP); Tissue-specific expression; Binding specificity; Hemiptera; Miridae

资金

  1. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund of China [2012ZL038]
  2. National Department Public Benefit Research Foundation of China [201103012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the sucking insect, Apolygus lucorum, taste is essential for finding host plants and oviposition sites. In A. lucorum, taste relies largely on the sensory system located within its proboscis. In this study, we constructed a cDNA library from A. lucorum proboscises and conducted preliminary analysis of 1554 ESTs. From this collection, we identified three putative odorant-binding proteins (AlucOBP3, AlucOBP4, AlucOBP6) and one chemosensory protein (AlucCSP1). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to study the expression pattern of these four genes. All four were expressed mainly in antennae, proboscises and legs, suggestive of roles in olfaction and gustation. We expressed and purified recombinant versions of AlucOBP3, AlucOBP4, AlucOBP6, and AlucCSP1 in a prokaryotic expression system. The ligand-binding specificities of the four proteins then were investigated in competition assays using 4,4'-dianilino-1,1'-binaphthyl-5, 5'-sulfonic acid (bis-ANS) as a probe. Of the 58 small organic compounds and five cotton secondary metabolites tested, plant volatiles cannot effectively displace bis-ANS from any of the four proteins. In contrast, most of the cotton secondary metabolites have high affinities for the three OBPs and AlucCSP1, indicating that these binding proteins more likely play a role in gustation than in olfaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据