4.3 Article

(±)-Catechin, A Root Exudate of the Invasive Centaurea Stoebe Lam. (Spotted Knapweed) Exhibits Bacteriostatic Activity Against Multiple Soil Bacterial Populations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY
卷 37, 期 9, 页码 1044-1053

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-0005-6

关键词

Catechin; Root exudate; Microbial community inhibition; Bacteriostatic; Invasive weed; Centaurea stoebe

资金

  1. United States Department of Agriculture - National Research Initiative USDA-CSREES [2003-35320-13586]
  2. NSF [0331964]
  3. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  4. Office Of The Director [0331964] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the effects of allelopathic plant chemicals on soil microorganisms is critical to understanding their ecological roles and importance in exotic plant invasion. Centaurea stoebe Lam. (spotted knapweed), an aggressive invasive weed in North America, secretes a racemic mixture of (+/-)-catechin as a root exudate. This enantiomeric, polyphenolic compound has been reported to have allelopathic effects on surrounding flora and micro-flora. To better understand how catechin affects microbial communities in the root zone of spotted knapweed, we assessed its impact on the total culturable bacterial component and numerous individual bacterial populations from Romanian (native range) and Montana (invaded range) soils. Catechin suppressed total culturable count numbers from the bacterial community and inhibited growth of some, but not all, soil bacterial populations tested. The native soil bacterial community was significantly more resistant to inhibitory effects of catechin than either the invaded or non-invaded soils. We further show that the inhibitory effect of catechin on nine different soil bacterial strains from seven genera was reversible, demonstrating that it acts via a bacteriostatic rather than bactericidal mechanism. These findings suggest that catechin might affect bacterial community composition and activity in the root zone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据