4.5 Article

Association between rs6812193 polymorphism and sporadic Parkinson's disease susceptibility

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1479-1481

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2186-1

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Polymorphism; Rs6812193; Meta-analysis; Ethnicity

资金

  1. National Youth Science and Technology Innovation Award Foundation of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the association of a single nucleotide polymorphism rs6812193 C/T with sporadic Parkinson's disease (PD) susceptibility has been widely evaluated, but the results remained inconsistent. This association should be clarified because of the importance of it on human health and quality of life. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the association between the rs6812193 polymorphism and sporadic PD. PubMed was used to retrieve articles published up to June 2014 for all studies evaluating the rs6812193 polymorphism and PD in humans. Ethnicity-specific subgroup analysis was also performed based on ethnicity susceptibility. A total of 17 independent study samples (15 Caucasians and 2 Asians) including 17,956 cases and 52,751 controls were used in the presented study. The MAF(T) (minor allele T frequency) in PD patients of European descent is obviously higher than Asian cases (p < 0.01). The results suggested the rs6812193 polymorphism (allele T vs. C) is significantly associated with PD susceptibility among overall samples (OR 0.882, 95 % CI 0.856-0.908) and Caucasian population (OR 0.881, 95 % CI 0.856-0.907), but not in Asian samples (OR 0.918, 95 % CI 0.721-1.168). No evidence of publication bias was observed. Throughout our analysis, the rs6812193 polymorphism is significantly associated with sporadic PD susceptibility in Caucasian samples, and ethnicity might be the key point of inconsistency in rs6812193 studies. Further studies are warranted to re-examine the observed associations, especially in different ethnicities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据