4.5 Article

An epidemiologic study of restless legs syndrome among Chinese children and adolescents

期刊

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 971-976

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2206-1

关键词

Restless legs syndrome; Children; Adolescents; Prevalence; Chinese

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [U1304804]
  2. Youth Innovation Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine the prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in Chinese children and adolescents as well as the impact of the disorder on 8-11 and 12-17 years old. This population-based study was conducted in five primary schools and seven high schools, which were randomly selected in Henan province, China. A total of 6792 students aged 8-17 years old were given a questionnaire that included the adult diagnostic criteria of RLS proposed by the International Restless Legs Study Group. Subjects who answered yes to all four questions were selected for a face-to-face interview to confirm RLS diagnosis. Individuals with definite RLS were then administered another questionnaire to survey RLS symptoms and perceived consequences. The prevalence of definite RLS in Chinese children and adolescents was 2.2 % (141/6437), with a prevalence of 1.8 % in the 8-11 years old age group and 2.4 % in the 12-17 years old age group. RLS was found to be more prevalent in females (2.7 %) than in males (1.7 %) (P = 0.008), and the prevalence of RLS was determined to increase with age. Sleep disturbance was the most common symptom of RLS in children and adolescents. Various consequences were attributed to RLS, with participants reporting that they dreaded the arrival of evening/night most frequently, followed by the description that RLS had a negative impact on mood. These data suggest that RLS is prevalent in Chinese children and adolescents, and that those affected by this disorder suffer from disruptions to sleep and daytime function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据