4.6 Article

Blood-brain barrier breakdown involves four distinct stages of vascular damage in various models of experimental focal cerebral ischemia

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.199

关键词

blood-brain barrier; brain ischemia; focal ischemia; intracerebral hemorrhage; neurovascular unit

资金

  1. Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig
  2. University of Leipzig
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG-FOR1336]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ischemic stroke not only impairs neuronal function but also affects the cerebral vasculature as indicated by loss of blood brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Therefore, therapeutical recanalization includes an enhanced risk for hemorrhagic transformation and bleeding, traditionally attributed to a 'reperfusion injury'. To investigate the mechanisms underlying ischemia-/reperfusion-related BBB opening, we applied multiple immunofluorescence labeling and electron microscopy in a rat model of thromboembolic stroke as well as mouse models of permanent and transient focal cerebral ischemia. In these models, areas exhibiting BBB breakdown were identified by extravasation of intravenously administered fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-albumin. After 24 hours, expression of markers for tight and adherens junctions in areas of FITC-albumin leakage consistently remained unaltered in the applied models. However, lectin staining with isolectin B4 indicated structural alterations in the endothelium, which were confirmed by electron microscopy. While ultrastructural alterations in endothelial cells did not differ between the applied models including the reperfusion scenario, we regularly identified vascular alterations, which we propose to reflect four distinct stages of BBB breakdown with ultimate loss of endothelial cells. Therefore, our data strongly suggest that ischemia-related BBB failure is predominantly caused by endothelial degeneration. Thus, protecting endothelial cells may represent a promising therapeutical approach in addition to the established, recanalizing strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据