4.6 Review

Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1222-1232

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.35

关键词

action potential; cortex; cerebellum; energy; fMRI; synapse

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. Government of Canada Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship
  3. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Post-Doctoral Fellowship
  4. European Research Council
  5. Fondation Leducq
  6. Wellcome Trust [075232, 086699]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The brain's energy supply determines its information processing power, and generates functional imaging signals. The energy use on the different subcellular processes underlying neural information processing has been estimated previously for the grey matter of the cerebral and cerebellar cortex. However, these estimates need reevaluating following recent work demonstrating that action potentials in mammalian neurons are much more energy efficient than was previously thought. Using this new knowledge, this paper provides revised estimates for the energy expenditure on neural computation in a simple model for the cerebral cortex and a detailed model of the cerebellar cortex. In cerebral cortex, most signaling energy (50%) is used on postsynaptic glutamate receptors, 21% is used on action potentials, 20% on resting potentials, 5% on presynaptic transmitter release, and 4% on transmitter recycling. In the cerebellar cortex, excitatory neurons use 75% and inhibitory neurons 25% of the signaling energy, and most energy is used on information processing by non-principal neurons: Purkinje cells use only 15% of the signaling energy. The majority of cerebellar signaling energy use is on the maintenance of resting potentials (54%) and postsynaptic receptors (22%), while action potentials account for only 17% of the signaling energy use. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2012) 32, 1222-1232; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.35; published online 21 March 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据