4.6 Article

Cerebral blood flow and metabolism of hyperperfusion after cerebral revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 2066-2075

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.110

关键词

hyperperfusion; moyamoya disease; positron emission tomography

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In moyamoya disease (MMD), surgical revascularization may be complicated with postoperative hyperperfusion. We analyzed cerebral perfusion and metabolism using positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before and after bypass surgery on 42 sides of 34 adult patients with MMD. In seven cases (16.7%) with symptomatic hyperperfusion, diagnosed by qualitative I-123-iodoamphetamine (IMP) SPECT, a subsequent PET study during postoperative subacute stages revealed significantly increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) from 34.1 +/- 8.2 to 74.3 +/- 12.8 mL/100 g per minute (P<0.01), a persistent increase in cerebral blood volume (CBV) from 5.77 +/- 1.67 to 7.01 +/- 1.44 mL/100 g and a significant decrease in oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) from 0.61 +/- 0.09 to 0.40 +/- 0.08 (P<0.01). Mean absolute CBF values during symptomatic hyperperfusion were more than the normal control +2 standard deviations, the predefined criteria of PET. Interestingly, two patients with markedly increased cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) at hyperperfusion were complicated with postoperative seizure. Among preoperative PET parameters, increased OEF was the only significant risk factor for symptomatic hyperperfusion (P<0.05). This study revealed that symptomatic hyperperfusion in MMD is characterized by temporary increases in CBF >100% over preoperative values caused by prolonged recovery of increased CBV. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2012) 32, 2066-2075; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.110; published online 1 August 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据