4.6 Article

Imaging of perfusion, angiogenesis, and tissue elasticity after stroke

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1496-1507

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.49

关键词

middle cerebral artery occlusion; PET; shear wave imaging; SPECT; stroke; ultrasound

资金

  1. sixth FW EU [LSHC-CT-2004-503569, LSHB-CT-2005-512146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blood flow interruption in a cerebral artery causes brain ischemia and induces dramatic changes of perfusion and metabolism in the corresponding territory. We performed in parallel positron emission tomography (PET) with [O-15]H2O, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with [Tc-99m]hexamethylpropylene-amino-oxime ([Tc-99m] HMPAO) and ultrasonic ultrafast shear wave imaging (SWI) during, immediately after, and 1, 2, 4, and 7 days after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats. Positron emission tomography and SPECT showed initial hypoperfusion followed by recovery at immediate reperfusion, hypoperfusion at day 1, and hyperperfusion at days 4 to 7. Hyperperfusion interested the whole brain, including nonischemic areas. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated active angiogenesis at days 2 to 7, strongly suggestive that hyperperfusion was supported by an increase in microvessel density in both brain hemispheres after ischemia. The SWI detected elastic changes of cerebral tissue in the ischemic area as early as day 1 after MCAO appearing as a softening of cerebral tissue whose local internal elasticity decreased continuously from day 1 to 7. Taken together, these results suggest that hyperperfusion after cerebral ischemia is due to formation of neovessels, and indicate that brain softening is an early and continuous process. The SWI is a promising novel imaging method for monitoring the evolution of cerebral ischemia over time in animals. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2012) 32, 1496-1507; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.49; published online 11 April 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据