4.6 Article

Changes in callosal motor fiber integrity after subcortical stroke of the pyramidal tract

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1515-1524

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.37

关键词

callosal motor fibers (CMF); diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); subcortical stroke; tractography

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Fondation pour la recherche en sante de Quebec
  4. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the healthy brain, there are close correlations between task-related activation of the primary motor cortex (M1), the magnitude of interhemispheric inhibition, and microstructural properties of transcallosal fiber tracts. After subcortical stroke affecting the pyramidal tract (PT), an abnormal pattern of bilateral activity develops in M1. With this prospective longitudinal study, we aimed to determine whether a morphological correlate of poststroke disinhibition could be measured within 20 days and 6 months of PT stroke. Using diffusion tensor imaging with tractography, we delineated transcallosal motor fibers (CMF) in nine PT stroke patients, six patients with subcortical infarct not affecting the PT (NonPT) and six transient ischemic attack patients. We compared changes in CMF fractional anisotropy ratios (rFA) with rFA in a distinct bundle of callosal occipital fibers (COF). At the initial time point, there were no significant differences in rFA between groups and fiber bundles. At follow-up, PT-group rFA(CMF) was significantly lower than PT-group rFA(COF) and NonPT-group rFA(CMF). PT-group rFA(CMF) decreased over time and correlated with rFA of the PT (rFA(PT)) retrograde to the infarct at 6 months. Our data suggest a progressive degenerative transsynaptic effect of PT stroke on CMF, which could be a morphological correlate of transcallosal disinhibition. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2012) 32, 1515-1524; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.37; published online 21 March 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据