4.6 Review

Lower incidence of cerebral infarction correlates with improved functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 1545-1553

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.56

关键词

cerebral infarction; delayed cerebral ischemia; meta-analysis; outcome; subarachnoid hemorrhage; systematic review

资金

  1. Netherlands Thrombosis Foundation, The Netherlands [2010-4]
  2. Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite an undisputed association between vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), there is debate if this association implies causality. It has been suggested that cerebral infarction is a better outcome measure than vasospasm in clinical trials and observational studies. To further investigate the relationship between infarction and outcome, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that studied the efficacy of pharmaceutical preventive strategies in SAH patients, and had both cerebral infarction and clinical outcome as outcome events. Effect sizes were expressed in (pooled) risk ratio (RR) estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses were performed for studies with a low risk of bias and for those who reported outcome at 3 months after SAH. Twenty-four studies including 8,552 patients were included. Pharmaceutical treatments decreased the incidence of both cerebral infarction (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.93) and of poor functional outcome (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98). The sensitivity analyses did not change the results essentially. These data suggest that the previously observed association between cerebral infarction and functional outcome implies causality, and that cerebral infarction is a better outcome measure than vasospasm in clinical trials and observational studies. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2011) 31, 1545-1553; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.56; published online 20 April 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据