4.6 Article

Validating a local Arterial Input Function method for improved perfusion quantification in stroke

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 2189-2198

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.78

关键词

Arterial Input Function; bolus-tracking MRI; cerebral blood flow; deconvolution; perfusion; stroke

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia
  2. Austin Health
  3. Victorian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In bolus-tracking perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), temporal dispersion of the contrast bolus due to stenosis or collateral supply presents a significant problem for accurate perfusion quantification in stroke. One means to reduce the associated perfusion errors is to deconvolve the bolus concentration time-course data with local Arterial Input Functions (AIFs) measured close to the capillary bed and downstream of the arterial abnormalities causing dispersion. Because the MRI voxel resolution precludes direct local AIF measurements, they must be extrapolated from the surrounding data. To date, there have been no published studies directly validating these local AIFs. We assess the effectiveness of local AIFs in reducing dispersion-induced perfusion error by measuring the residual dispersion remaining in the local AIF deconvolved perfusion maps. Two approaches to locating the local AIF voxels are assessed and compared with a global AIF deconvolution across 19 bolus-tracking data sets from patients with stroke. The local AIF methods reduced dispersion in the majority of data sets, suggesting more accurate perfusion quantification. Importantly, the validation inherently identifies potential areas for perfusion underestimation. This is valuable information for the identification of at-risk tissue and management of stroke patients. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2011) 31, 2189-2198; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.78; published online 1 June 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据