4.6 Article

Vascular protection in diabetic stroke: role of matrix metalloprotease-dependent vascular remodeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1928-1938

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.120

关键词

diabetes; hemorrhagic transformation; MMP; stroke; vascular remodeling

资金

  1. NIH [DK074385, NS054688]
  2. American Heart Association
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temporary focal ischemia causes greater hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats, a model with increased cerebrovascular matrix metalloprotease (MMP) activity and tortuosity. The objective of the current study was to test the hypotheses that (1) diabetes-induced cerebrovascular remodeling is MMP dependent and (2) prevention of vascular remodeling by glucose control or MMP inhibition reduces HT in diabetic stroke. Control and GK rats were treated with vehicle, metformin, or minocycline for 4 weeks, and indices of remodeling including vascular tortuosity index, lumen diameter, number of collaterals, and middle cerebral artery (MCA) MMP activity were measured. Additional animals were subjected to 3 hours MCA occlusion/21 hours reperfusion, and infarct size and HT were evaluated as indices of neurovascular injury. All remodeling markers including MMP-9 activity were increased in diabetes. Infarct size was smaller in minocycline-treated animals. Both metformin and minocycline reduced vascular remodeling and severity of HT in diabetes. These results provide evidence that diabetes-mediated stimulation of MMP-9 activity promotes cerebrovascular remodeling, which contributes to greater HT in diabetes. Metformin and minocycline offer vascular protection, which has important clinical implications for diabetes patients who are at a fourfold to sixfold higher risk for stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2010) 30, 1928-1938; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.120; published online 28 July 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据