4.6 Article

Pretreatment diffusion-and perfusion-MR lesion volumes have a crucial influence on clinical response to stroke thrombolysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 1214-1225

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.3

关键词

ischemic stroke; diffusion MRI; perfusion MRI; thrombolysis

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Foundation
  2. National Stroke Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

hypothesized that pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) lesion volumes may have influenced clinical response to thrombolysis in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET). In 98 patients randomized to intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or placebo 3 to 6 h after stroke onset, we examined increasing acute DWI and PWI lesion volumes (Tmax-with 2-sec delay increments), and increasing PWI/DWI mismatch ratios, on the odds of both excellent (modified Rankin Scale (mRS): 0 to 1) and poor (mRS: 5 to 6) clinical outcome. Patients with very large PWI lesions (most had internal carotid artery occlusion) had increased odds ratio (OR) of poor outcome with IV-tPA (58% versus 25% placebo; OR = 4.13, P = 0.032 for Tmax +2-sec volume > 190 mL). Excellent outcome from tPA treatment was substantially increased in patients with DWI lesions < 18mL (77% versus 18% placebo, OR = 15.0, P < 0.001). Benefit from tPA was also seen with DWI lesions up to 25mL (69% versus 29% placebo, OR = 5.5, P = 0.03), but not for DWI lesions > 25 mL. In contrast, increasing mismatch ratios did not influence the odds of excellent outcome with tPA. Clinical responsiveness to IV-tPA, and stroke outcome, depends more on baseline DWI and PWI lesion volumes than the extent of perfusion-diffusion mismatch. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2010) 30, 1214-1225; doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.3; published online 20 January 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据