4.6 Article

Methamphetamine disrupts blood-brain barrier function by induction of oxidative stress in brain endothelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 1933-1945

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2009.112

关键词

blood-brain barrier; methamphetamine; monocyte; oxidative stress; tight junction

资金

  1. NIH [DA025566, AA015913, DA024979]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methamphetamine (METH), a potent stimulant with strong euphoric properties, has a high abuse liability and long-lasting neurotoxic effects. Recent studies in animal models have indicated that METH can induce impairment of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), thus suggesting that some of the neurotoxic effects resulting from METH abuse could be the outcome of barrier disruption. In this study, we provide evidence that METH alters BBB function through direct effects on endothelial cells and explore possible underlying mechanisms leading to endothelial injury. We report that METH increases BBB permeability in vivo, and exposure of primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMVEC) to METH diminishes the tightness of BMVEC monolayers in a dose- and time-dependent manner by decreasing the expression of cell membrane-associated tight junction (TJ) proteins. These changes were accompanied by the enhanced production of reactive oxygen species, increased monocyte migration across METH-treated endothelial monolayers, and activation of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) in BMVEC. Antioxidant treatment attenuated or completely reversed all tested aspects of METH-induced BBB dysfunction. Our data suggest that BBB injury is caused by METH-mediated oxidative stress, which activates MLCK and negatively affects the TJ complex. These observations provide a basis for antioxidant protection against brain endothelial injury caused by METH exposure. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2009) 29, 1933-1945; doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.112; published online 5 August 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据