4.6 Article

Hypoxia and hypotension transform the blood flow response to cortical spreading depression from hyperemia into hypoperfusion in the rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 1369-1376

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.35

关键词

cerebral blood flow; electrophysiology; hypotension; hypoxia; laser Doppler flowmetry; spreading depression

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS061505, 1R01NS61505, P01NS055104] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cortical spreading depression (CSD) evokes a large cerebral blood flow (CBF) increase in normal rat brain. In contrast, in focal ischemic penumbra, CSD-like periinfarct depolarizations (PID) are mainly associated with hypoperfusion. Because PIDs electrophysiologically closely resemble CSD, we tested whether conditions present in ischemic penumbra, such as tissue hypoxia or reduced perfusion pressure, transform the CSD-induced CBF response in nonischemic rat cortex. Cerebral blood flow changes were recorded using laser Doppler flowmetry in rats subjected to hypoxia, hypotension, or both. Under normoxic normotensive conditions, CSD caused a characteristic transient CBF increase (74 +/- 7%) occasionally preceded by a small hypoperfusion (-4 +/- 2%). Both hypoxia (pO(2) 45 +/- 3mmHg) and hypotension (blood pressure 42 +/- 2mmHg) independently augmented this initial hypoperfusion (-14 +/- 2% normoxic hypotension; -16 +/- 6% hypoxic normotension; -21 +/- 5% hypoxic hypotension) and diminished the magnitude of hyperemia (44 +/- 10% normoxic hypotension; 43 +/- 9% hypoxic normotension; 27 +/- 6% hypoxic hypotension). Hypotension and, to a much lesser extent, hypoxia increased the duration of hypoperfusion and the DC shift, whereas CSD amplitude remained unchanged. These results suggest that hypoxia and/or hypotension unmask a vasoconstrictive response during CSD in the rat such that, under nonphysiologic conditions (i.e., mimicking ischemic penumbra), the hyperemic response to CSD becomes attenuated resembling the blood flow response during PIDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据