4.6 Article

Necrostatin-1 reduces histopathology and improves functional outcome after controlled cortical impact in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 1564-1573

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.44

关键词

necroptosis; necrostatin; traumatic brain injury; mice; necrosis; inflammation

资金

  1. NIH/NINDS [RO1NS47447, P30NS45776]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P30NS045776, R21NS067497, R01NS047447, R01NS061255] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Necroptosis is a newly identified type of programmed necrosis initiated by the activation of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha)/Fas. Necrostatin-1 is a specific inhibitor of necroptosis that reduces ischemic tissue damage in experimental stroke models. We previously reported decreased tissue damage and improved functional outcome after controlled cortical impact (CCI) in mice deficient in TNFa and Fas. Hence, we hypothesized that necrostatin-1 would reduce histopathology and improve functional outcome after CCI in mice. Compared with vehicle-/inactive analog-treated controls, mice administered necrostatin-1 before CCI had decreased propidium iodide-positive cells in the injured cortex and dentate gyrus (6 h), decreased brain tissue damage (days 14, 35), improved motor (days 1 to 7), and Morris water maze performance (days 8 to 14) after CCI. Improved spatial memory was observed even when drug was administered 15 mins after CCI. Necrostatin-1 treatment did not reduce caspase-3-positive cells in the dentate gyrus or cortex, consistent with a known caspase-independent mechanism of necrostatin-1. However, necrostatin-1 reduced brain neutrophil influx and microglial activation at 48 h, suggesting a novel anti-inflammatory effect in traumatic brain injury (TBI). The data suggest that necroptosis plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of cell death and functional outcome after TBI and that necrostatin-1 may have therapeutic potential for patients with TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据