4.6 Article

Endogenous melatonin increases in cerebrospinal fluid of patients after severe traumatic brain injury and correlates with oxidative stress and metabolic disarray

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600603

关键词

cerebrospinal fluid; lipid peroxidation; melatonin; metabolism; oxidative stress; traumatic brain injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress plays a significant role in secondary damage after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI); and melatonin exhibits both direct and indirect antioxidant effects. Melatonin deficiency is deleterious in TBI animal models, and its administration confers neuroprotection, reducing cerebral oedema, and improving neurobehavioural outcome. This study aimed to measure the endogenous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum melatonin levels post-TBI in humans and to identify relationships with markers of oxidative stress via 8-isoprostaglandin-F-2 alpha (isoprostane), brain metabolism and neurologic outcome. Cerebrospinal fluid and serum samples of 39 TBI patients were assessed for melatonin, isoprostane, and various metabolites. Cerebrospinal fluid but not serum melatonin levels were markedly elevated (7.28 +/- 0.92 versus 1.47 +/- 0.35 pg/mL, P<0.0005). Isoprostane levels also increased in both CSF (127.62 +/- 16.85 versus 18.28 +/- 4.88 pg/mL, P<0.0005) and serum (562.46 +/- 50.78 versus 126.15 +/- 40.08 pg/mL (P<0.0005). A strong correlation between CSF melatonin and CSF isoprostane on day 1 after injury (r = 0.563, P = 0.002) suggests that melatonin production increases in conjunction with lipid peroxidation in TBI. Relationships between CSF melatonin and pyruvate (r = 0.369, P = 0.049) and glutamate (r = 0.373, P = 0.046) indicate that melatonin production increases with metabolic disarray. In conclusion, endogenous CSF melatonin levels increase after TBI, whereas serum levels do not. This elevation is likely to represent a response to oxidative stress and metabolic disarray, although further studies are required to elucidate these relationships.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据