4.5 Article

Comparative analysis of the proteomic and nutritional composition of transgenic rice seeds with Cry1ab/ac genes and their non-transgenic counterparts

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 226-233

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.12.004

关键词

Transgenic rice seeds; Nutritional composition analysis; Proteomics; Safety assessment; Growth environment

资金

  1. National GMO Cultivation Major Project of New Varieties [2008ZX08012-001]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology
  3. Ministry of Agriculture of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutritional assessment of transgenic crops used for human food and animal feed is an important component of safety evaluations. Profiling techniques, such as proteomics, are currently used as complementary analytical tools to detect the unintended effects of transgenic. We analyzed the proteomic profiles and nutritional composition of transgenic rice seeds containing the Cry1Ab/Ac protein to assess the safety of these transgenic seeds. We focused primarily on the effects of genetic modification and growth environment. By comparing proteomic profiles, we found that 21 proteins were up- or down-regulated as a consequence of environmental influence (WT01 vs. WT02). Similarly, 20 to 22 protein levels were differentially modulated in transgenic rice seeds in comparison to their non-transgenic counterparts (T01 vs. WT01; T02 vs. WT02). These latter changes may be due to the influence of growth environment and the insertion of a single gene into the rice genome. Based on the nutrient composition analysis (proximates, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, vitamins and anti-nutritive components), we conclude that the nutritional quality of the rice from the transgenic lines was equivalent to that of its non-transgenic counterparts and that the effect of growth environment on the rice was no less than that of the single gene insertion. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据