4.7 Article

Nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase regulates cell growth via the Sirt1/P53 signaling pathway and is a prognosis marker in colorectal cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 4, 页码 4385-4395

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27228

关键词

apoptosis; cell cycle; colorectal cancer (CRC); FK866; nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT)

资金

  1. Guangdong High-level University Construction Fund for Jinan University [88016013034]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Research [2014A030313383]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472849]
  4. China Scholarship Council from Oversea Study Fellowship [201706780020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy, and the metabolic properties of CRC cells include enhanced aerobic glycolysis (the Warburg effect). Nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT) is one of the crucial enzymes that regulate the activity of nicotinamide adenine dinucleodinucleotide dependent enzymes. Targeting NAMPT is a potential method of CRC therapy. Nevertheless, the underlying clinical implications and regulatory mechanisms of NAMPT in CRC remain unclear. In this study, we showed that NAMPT protein expression was increased in subjects with rectal localization compared with those with colon localization, and NAMPT was a poor prognostic marker for the overall survival rate in patients with CRC. In addition, the NAMPT inhibitor FK866 or lentivirus-mediated silencing induced CRC cell growth inhibition. Mechanistically, NAMPT regulated Sirt1 and P53 expression and induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, along with the upregulation of downstream p21 and downregulation of cyclin D1, cyclin E1, and cyclin E2 expression. FK866 administration or knockdown of NAMPT induced CRC cell apoptosis via upregulation of caspase-3. In conclusion, NAMPT regulated Sirt1/P53 signaling during CRC cell growth and warrants further investigation for clinical administration in CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据