4.7 Article

DUSP1 recuses diabetic nephropathy via repressing JNK-Mff-mitochondrial fission pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 3, 页码 3043-3057

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27124

关键词

diabetic renal damage; DUSP1; Mff; mitochondrial fission

资金

  1. XuHui District medical peak subject construction project [SHXH201708]
  2. Xuhui District Central Hospital of Shanghai Initial Founding of Scientific Research for the Introduction of Talents [2017-2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive mitochondrial fission has been identified as the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy (DN), although the upstream regulatory signal for mitochondrial fission activation in the setting of DN remains unknown. In the current study, we found that dual-specificity protein phosphatase-1 (DUSP1) was actually downregulated by chronic hyperglycemia stimulus. Lower DUSP1 expression was associated with glucose metabolism disorder, renal dysfunction, kidney hypertrophy, renal fibrosis, and glomerular apoptosis. At the molecular level, defective DUSP1 expression activated JNK pathway, and the latter selectively opened mitochondrial fission by modulating mitochondrial fission factor (Mff) phosphorylation. Excessive Mff-related mitochondrial fission evoked mitochondrial oxidative stress, promoted mPTP opening, exacerbated proapoptotic protein leakage into the cytoplasm, and finally initiated mitochondria-dependent cellular apoptosis in the setting of diabetes. However, overexpression of DUSP1 interrupted Mff-related mitochondrial fission, reducing hyperglycemia-mediated mitochondrial damage and thus improving renal function. Overall, we have shown that DUSP1 functions as a novel malefactor in diabetic renal damage that mediates via modifying Mff-related mitochondrial fission. Thus, finding strategies to regulate the balance of the DUSP1-JNK-Mff signaling pathway and mitochondrial homeostasis may be a therapeutic target for treating diabetic nephropathy in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据