4.7 Article

Gating of the Kir2.1 Channel at the Bundle Crossing Region by Intracellular Spermine and Other Cations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 229, 期 11, 页码 1703-1721

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24616

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan [NHRI-EX101-10006NI, NHRI-EX102-10006NI]
  2. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC95-2320-B-002-064-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Kir2.1 channel, the flow-dependent blocking effect of intracellular spermine (SPM) strongly indicates coupled movement of ions in a segment of the pore. We have shown that the bundle crossing region of M2 constitutes this critical segment of the pore. Moreover, this segment may undergo opening/closing conformational changes mimicking channel gating. In this study, we further investigate these gating conformational changes and relevant controlling mechanisms at this critical segment. We demonstrate that A184R mutation in the inner end of the bundle crossing region not only abolishes the inward rectifying features of SPM block but also tends to close the channel pore, which can then only be opened by intracellular (e. g., Na+, or equally effectively, K+) but not extracellular cations. We also found that the exit (back to the intracellular milieu) of the blocking in the deep site is facilitated rather than deterred by the presence of the other SPM in the superficial site. We conclude that intracellular SPM may bind to a deep site in the pore and serve as a flow-dependent blocker. The SPM in the superficial site, on the other hand, serves both as a docking form ready for permeation to the deep site, and as a gating particle capable of opening the bundle crossing region. This inner end of the bundle crossing region of the Kir2.1 channel pore thus constitutes a pivotal segment, which, in collaboration with intracellular SPM and K+ ions, closely couple channel gating to (inward rectifying) ion permeation. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据