4.7 Article

Functional cGMP-gated channels in cerebellar granule cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 227, 期 5, 页码 2252-2263

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.22964

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN, Spain) [BFU2006-01012/BFI, BFU2009-07092]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RD06/0026/0001, PI080227]
  3. Comunidad de Madrid [S-BIO-0170/2006]
  4. UCM [GR58/08-UCM-Santander]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGCs) are important transducers of external signals in sensory processes. These channels are ubiquitously expressed in a variety of neurons, and are necessary to transduce signals for growth cone guidance and plasticity. Here, we demonstrate that the CNGC subunits (CNGA1 and CNGB1, presumably the 1b isoform) are expressed in rat cerebellar granule cells and that they combine to form functional channels. The expression of the mRNAs that encode these proteins is maximal after 7 days in cell culture, when the channels are expressed at synapses and co-localize with the synaptic marker synapsin I. These ligand-gated channels are functional and can be blocked by Mg2+ or L-cis-diltiazem. Moreover, channel opening in response to increases in intracellular cGMP results in Ca2+ entry into the cell. Chronic blockade (96h) of these channels with L-cis-diltiazem significantly decreases the number of functional boutons, as determined by their capacity to load and unload the styryl dye FM1-43 when stimulated. Moreover, the unloading kinetics is modified from a biphasic to a monophasic profile in a subset of synaptic boutons. These channels are also expressed in early developmental stages, both in the soma and in emerging processes, and CNGA1 can be detected in growth cones. Pharmacological blockade of these channels with L-cis-diltiazem causes an overall change in growth cone morphology, impairing the formation of lamellipodia between filopodia and increasing the number of filopodia. J. Cell. Physiol. 227: 2252-2263, 2012. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据