4.7 Article

Flow Cytometric Sorting of Neuronal and Glial Nuclei From Central Nervous System Tissue

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 226, 期 2, 页码 552-558

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.22365

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. General Insurance Association of Japan (Research Foundations)
  3. Brain Science Foundation
  4. Kaibara Morikazu Medical Science Promotion Foundation
  5. Japan Orthopaedic and Traumatology Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23650327, 23123516, 23651195, 22390292] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the complex cellular heterogeneity of the central nervous system (CNS), it is relatively difficult to reliably obtain molecular descriptions with cell-type specificity. In particular, comparative analysis of epigenetic regulation or molecular profiles is hampered by the lack of adequate methodology for selective purification of defined cell populations from CNS tissue. Here, we developed a direct purification strategy of neural nuclei from CNS tissue based on fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). We successfully fractionated nuclei from complex tissues such as brain, spinal cord, liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle extruded mechanically or chemically, and fractionated nuclei were structurally maintained and contained nucleoproteins and nuclear DNA/RNA. We collected sufficient numbers of nuclei from neurons and oligodendrocytes using FACS with immunolabeling for nucleoproteins or from genetically labeled transgenic mice. In addition, the use of Fab fragments isolated from papain antibody digests, which effectively enriched the specialized cell populations, significantly enhanced the immunolabeling efficacy. This methodology can be applied to a wide variety of heterogeneous tissues and is crucial for understanding the cell-specific information about chromatin dynamics, nucleoproteins, protein-DNA/RNA interactions, and transcriptomes retained in the nucleus, such as non-coding RNAs. J. Cell. Physiol. 226: 552-558, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据