4.7 Article

A New Role of Anandamide in Human Sperm: Focus on Metabolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 221, 期 1, 页码 147-153

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21837

关键词

-

资金

  1. MURST
  2. Associazione Educazione e Ricerca Medica Salernitana (ERMES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endocannabinoid system and the presence of CBI receptor (CBI-R) target of the anandamide were identified in human sperm, however the anandamide action in this context needs to be further elucidated. At this purpose we analyzed the effects of anandamide on human sperm capacitation and motility. Afterwards, we focused on lipid and glucose sperm metabolism and also investigated the interrelationship between anandamide and insulin secretion by sperm. By intracellular free Ca2+ content assay and proteins tyrosine phosphorylation, we evidenced that anandamide did not induce capacitation process and a negative effect was obtained on sperm motility. The blockage of CBI-R by the specific antagonist SR141716 increased both capacitation and sperm motility suggesting an involvement of the CBI-R in the acquisition of sperm fertilizing activity. The evaluation of the triglycerides content, lipase and acyl-CoA dehydrogenase activities, suggest that anandamide exerts a lipogenetic effect on human sperm lipid metabolism. Concerning the glucose metabolism, anandamide increases GSK3 phosphorylation indicating that it is involved in the accumulation of energy substrates. G6PDH activity was not affected by anandamide. Interestingly, AEA is involved in insulin secretion by sperm. As insulin had been demonstrated to be an autocrine factor that triggers capacitation, the endocannabinoid might be inserted in the signaling cascade that induces this process. Altogether these findings highlight a pivotal involvement of the CBI-R in the control of sperm energy homeostasis and propose a new site of action for endocannabinoids in the control of energy metabolism. J. Cell. Physiol. 221: 147-153, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据