4.7 Article

Rapamycin Impairs Trabecular Bone Acquisition From High-Dose But Not Low-Dose Intermittent Parathyroid Hormone Treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 221, 期 3, 页码 579-585

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21887

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AR053280, AR646530, AR53237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The osteo-anabolic effects of intermittent parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment require insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling through the IGF-I receptor. A major downstream target of the IGF-I receptor (via Akt) is the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a kinase involved in protein synthesis. We investigated whether the bone-building effects of intermittent PTH require functional mTOR signaling. Mice were treated with daily PTH 1-34 (0, 10, 30, or 90 mu g/kg) for 6 weeks in the presence or absence of rapamycin, a selective inhibitor of mTOR. We found that all PTH doses were effective in enhancing bone mass, whether rapamycin was present or not. Rapamycin had little to no effect on the anabolic response at low (10 mu g) PTH doses, small effects in a minority of anabolic measures at moderate doses (30 mu g), but the anabolic effects of high-dose PTH (90 mu g) were consistently and significantly suppressed by rapamycin (similar to 4-36% reduction). Serum levels of Trap5b, a marker of resorption, were significantly enhanced by rapamycin, but these effects were observed whether PTH was absent or present. Our data suggest that intermittent PTH, particularly at lower doses, is effective in building bone mass in the presence of rapamycin. However, the full anabolic effects of higher doses of PTH are significantly suppressed by rapamycin, suggesting that PTH might normally activate additional pathways (including mTOR) for its enhanced high-dose anabolic effects. Clinical doses of intermittent PTH could be an effective treatment for maintaining or increasing bone mass among patients taking rapamycin analogs for unrelated health issues. J. Cell. Physiol. 221: 579-585, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据