4.7 Article

Genetic upregulation of matriptase-2 reduces the aggressiveness of prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo and affects FAK and paxillin localisation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 216, 期 3, 页码 780-789

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21460

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cellular function and the role of matriptase-2 in cancer progression are poorly understood. This study assesses the importance of this protease in prostate cancer cell lines. Two prostate cancer cell lines, PC-3 and DU-145, previously displaying minimal expression of matriptase-2, were forced to over-express matriptase-2 using a human mammalian expression construct. Over-expression of matriptase-2 significantly reduced the invasive capacity and significantly slowed the migration rates of PC-3 and DU-145 cells in vitro. Similarly, PC-3 cells containing the matriptase-2 expression plasmid were dramatically less able to survive, grow and develop into noticeable tumours, compared to control PC-3 cells containing an empty plasmid alone, following subcutaneous inoculation into CID I nude mice. This trend was observed throughout the experiment, becoming apparent after the initial reading on day 7 (P = 0.0002) and continuing to the experimental end point at day 27 (P 0.0002). Enhanced matriptase-2 levels were also seen to correlate with increased fluorescent staining of the paxillin and FAK adhesion molecules, where a greater extent of these molecules were localised to the focal adhesion complexes. This data suggests a suppressive role for matriptase-2 in the invasion and migration of prostate cancer cells in vitro and also in their development and growth in vivo, highlighting the potential of this molecule to interfere with key stages of metastasis. Furthermore, the data presented implies a possible connection between matriptase-2 and the paxillin and FAK adhesion molecules which may ultimately contribute to the reduced migration rates seen in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据