4.6 Article

Osteoactivin Promotes Osteoblast Adhesion Through HSPG and αvβ1 Integrin

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 115, 期 7, 页码 1243-1253

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.24760

关键词

OSTEOACTIVIN; OSTEOBLAST; ADHESION; INTEGRIN; OSTEOBLAST DIFFERENTIATION

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [R01AR048892]
  2. Ohio Department of Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoactivin (OA), also known as glycoprotein nmb (gpnmb) plays an important role in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation and function. OA induced osteoblast differentiation and function in vitro by stimulating alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, osteocalcin production, nodule formation, and matrix mineralization. Recent studies reported a role for OA in cell adhesion and integrin binding. In this study, we demonstrate that recombinant osteoactivin (rOA) as a matricellular protein stimulated adhesion, spreading and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells through binding to (v1) integrin and heparan sulfated proteoglycans (HSPGs). MC3T3-E1 cell adhesion to rOA was blocked by neutralizing anti-OA or anti-(v) and (1) integrin antibodies. rOA stimulated-osteoblast adhesion was also inhibited by soluble heparin and sodium chlorate. Interestingly, rOA stimulated-osteoblast adhesion promoted an increase in FAK and ERK activation, resulting in the formation of focal adhesions, cell spreading and enhanced actin cytoskeleton organization. In addition, differentiation of primary osteoblasts was augmented on rOA coated-wells marked by increased alkaline phosphatase staining and activity. Taken together, these data implicate OA as a matricellular protein that stimulates osteoblast adhesion through binding to (v1) integrin and cell surface HSPGs, resulting in increased cell spreading, actin reorganization, and osteoblast differentiation with emphasis on the positive role of OA in osteogenesis. J. Cell. Biochem. 115: 1243-1253, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据