4.6 Article

Mitochondrial accumulation under oxidative stress is due to defects in autophagy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 114, 期 1, 页码 212-219

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.24356

关键词

AUTOPHAGY; TERT-BUTYL HYDROPEROXIDE (tBHP); MITOCHONDRIAL MASS; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA (mtDNA); MITOCHONDRIAL BIOGENESIS; OXIDATIVE STRESS

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30930105, 31070740]
  2. New Century Excellent Talents in University
  3. Xi'an Jiaotong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial dynamics maintains normal mitochondrial function by degrading damaged mitochondria and generating newborn mitochondria. The accumulation of damaged mitochondria influences the intracellular environment by promoting mitochondrial dysfunction, and thus initiating a vicious cycle. Oxidative stress induces mitochondrial malfunction, which is involved in many cardiovascular diseases. However, the mechanism of mitochondrial accumulation in cardiac myoblasts remains unclear. We observed mitochondrial dysfunction and an increase in mitochondrial mass under the oxidative conditions produced by tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBHP) in cardiac myoblast H9c2 cells. However, in contrast to the increase in mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) decreased, suggesting that enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis may be not the primary cause of the mitochondrial accumulation. Therefore, we investigated changes in a number of proteins involved in autophagy. Beclin1, Atg12Atg5 conjugate, Atg7 contents decreased but LC3-II accumulated in tBHP-treated H9c2 cells. Moreover, the capacity for acid hydrolysis decreased in H9c2 cells. We also demonstrated a decrease in DJ-1 protein under the oxidative conditions that deregulate mitochondrial dynamics. These results reveal that autophagy became defective under oxidative stress. We therefore suggest that defects in autophagy mediate mitochondrial accumulation under these conditions. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 212219, 2012. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据