4.6 Article

Curcumin Protects Against Ovariectomy-Induced Bone Loss and Decreases Osteoclastogenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 112, 期 11, 页码 3159-3166

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.23242

关键词

OVARIECTOMY; CURCUMIN; BONE LOSS; OSTEOCLASTOGENESIS; GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASE-1; RANKL

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government [NRF-BRL 2009-0087350, NRF-2009-0066232, NRF-2010-0002644]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Curcumin has anti-oxidative activity. In view of the increasing evidence for a biochemical link between increased oxidative stress and reduced bone density we hypothesized that curcumin might increase bone density by elevating antioxidant activity in some target cell type. We measured bone density by Micro-CT, enzyme expression levels by quantitative PCR or enzyme activity, and osteoclast (OC) formation by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining. The bone mineral density of the femurs of curcumin-administered mice was significantly higher than that of vehicle-treated mice after ovariectomy (OVX) and this was accompanied by reduced amounts of serum collagen-type I fragments, which are markers of bone resorption. Curcumin suppressed OC formation by increasing receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-induced glutathione peroxidase-1, and reversed the stimulatory effect of homocysteine, a known H2O2 generator, on OC formation by restoring Gpx activity. Curcumin generated an aberrant RANKL signal characterized by reduced expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells 2 (NFAT2) and attenuated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (ERK, JNK, and p38). Curcumin thus inhibited OVX-induced bone loss, at least in part by reducing osteoclastogenesis as a result of increased antioxidant activity and impaired RANKL signaling. These findings suggest that bone loss associated with estrogen deficiency could be attenuated by curcumin administration. J. Cell. Biochem. 112: 3159-3166, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据